General Discussion     Tech Questions     Parts & Services     Suggestions/Ideas     Help & Website Instructions     Blogs    

Truck & Transportation History

Home Search Tags


F750 to go with diesel or not?

Posted By JW Tuesday, November 13, 2018 9:40 AM
Add to Favorites2
Author Message
kblackav8or
 Posted Monday, November 26, 2018 12:04 PM
ATHS Member

ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 6:17 AM
Posts: 3,121, Visits: 13,633
Realistically you probably should stay in the DD 6V53, DD 4/53, IH DT360, Perkins 354, CAT 3208 or one of the smaller 6's, Cummings BT6 range or similar. A 6v92 is going to really stress a lighter chassis like an F600 chassis. If you are building a toy for fun any of those engines will be fun to drive. I would steer clear of the Class 7/8 level drivetrains for a smaller rig if you are just out having fun with this.


junkmandan
 Posted Friday, November 16, 2018 1:51 PM
ATHS Member

ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: 5 hours ago
Posts: 3,049, Visits: 8,054
JW-------------Now you're really getting carried away ............and talking like a school kid, maybe not even high school. Your 361 Ford probably produced about300 Lb Ft. torque, and the clutch, transmission, radiator, drive line was engineered for that rating. You may not know the mid range diesels like Dt 466, 3208, 6V53 range from 430 to a little less than 600 lb ft of torque, so thet's stretching the limits of your chassis. If you had any thoughts of a 6V92 with a potential 1000 lb. ft torque...............that's just plain stupidity. If you're gonna haul that much weight, ditch the Ford and buy a real truck !
JW
 Posted Friday, November 16, 2018 8:46 AM
.

. - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Sunday, November 18, 2018 2:04 PM
Posts: 9, Visits: 10
82
As far as the weight thing goes, I understand I can't put to big of and engine in, without a lot of modification. On the other hand I was looking online at the Depco site at the weights of the different engines. A 6v92 Detroit weighs 1960 lbs without a turbo and 2005 with. Ford had the Kitty Cat 3208 in those trucks and it weighs 2080 lbs with or without the turbo. So I would think the 6v92 Detroit would be an option? The only thing i'm not sure of is what transmission and rear end Ford used with the 3208 Cat. Also does any one know how good the 3208 with turbo is as to the naturally aspirated ones? I know the 3208s weren't a real popular engine to most folks. Especially the naturally aspirated. Just wondering about the turbo ones.
Friday, November 16, 2018 8:51 AM by JW
JW
 Posted Friday, November 16, 2018 8:37 AM
.

. - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Sunday, November 18, 2018 2:04 PM
Posts: 9, Visits: 10
82
I've been looking at school buses as an option for the engine and drive train.
kblackav8or
 Posted Thursday, November 15, 2018 7:35 PM
ATHS Member

ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)ATHS Member - (181,328 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 6:17 AM
Posts: 3,121, Visits: 13,633
DT360 and DT466 are both great International Diesels as well. A 360 should fit pretty easily. The 466 might take a little work. School buses are also great places to find newer drivetrains. A


JW
 Posted Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:57 PM
.

. - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Sunday, November 18, 2018 2:04 PM
Posts: 9, Visits: 10
82
Thanks for the link. That was one of my fears that I'd run into. The bigger the engine of course the more weight and the front end of that truck not being able to support a bunch of engine weight.
JW
 Posted Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:55 PM
.

. - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Sunday, November 18, 2018 2:04 PM
Posts: 9, Visits: 10
82
Gotcha. That might be my better option for an easy swap.
junkmandan
 Posted Thursday, November 15, 2018 1:21 PM
ATHS Member

ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)ATHS Member - (204,937 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: 5 hours ago
Posts: 3,049, Visits: 8,054
The inline 53 would be the only option for direct bolt up with your transmission and clutch ...............However the 2 piece housing and flywheel are worth a grand, although you might find 'em cheaper with part #s I could give you .
Wolfcreek_Steve
 Posted Wednesday, November 14, 2018 7:31 PM
ATHS Member

ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)ATHS Member - (145,414 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 2,342, Visits: 16,875
When you get into the 71 and 92 series Detroits the weight is going to bite you. For reference a 6v53T weighs 1700 lbs and a 6v92T weighs 2000 lbs
https://www.depco.com/resources/standard-engine-specifications/
A 6bt Cummins is about 1000 lbs IIRC

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Steve Peterson
Central Wisconsin

Follow The Leaders For They Know The Way AUTOCAR
JW
 Posted Wednesday, November 14, 2018 5:50 PM
.

. - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation). - (82 reputation)

Group: Forum User
Last Active: Sunday, November 18, 2018 2:04 PM
Posts: 9, Visits: 10
82
That thought has crossed my mind as well. I'm just trying to figure out what would be all around best engine for the hp and torque. Not that I have to have a ton of hp, but I want a little get up and go when I need it. Yeah I've noticed a complete engine (Detroit) can be hard to find. Then a lot of the ones out there that are complete are old marine engines or generator engines. I guess those are usable? How much did the 6v53 set you back after the cross country trip?

Similar Topics

Expand / Collapse

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse

Back To Top